#Fall out 4 ufo tv

вЂњWe already live in an age of conspiracy theories,вЂќ Klein wrote. and China - that doesnвЂ™t seem likely.ДЄnd bad things could happen if the evidence gets stronger, even if the UFOs remain benign - starting with a super-charging of the вЂњfake newsвЂќ narrative. If the evidence gets stronger, will the nations of the world unite to confront the potential alien threat, as President Ronald Reagan suggested in a 1987 speech to the United Nations? Given how divided the world is - only starting with the U.S.

If the evidence gets stronger, will the Pentagon seek an even bigger budget? If the aliens are so much more advanced, that doesnвЂ™t make sense. government believes the Earth is being monitored by aliens with vastly superior technology, how should it respond? How can it respond?

#Fall out 4 ufo tv

Last Sunday, a вЂњ60 MinutesвЂќ piece laid out the evidence that aliens are among us in interviews with current and former government officials.ДЄnd on Monday, after an initially jokey response to the UFO question in a TV interview, former President Barack Obama said, вЂњBut what is true - and IвЂ™m actually being serious here - is that thereвЂ™s footage and records of objects in the skies that we donвЂ™t know exactly what they are.вЂќДЄll of this begs the question: Now what? If the U.S. Right on cue, last Saturday, another stunning, inexplicable video emerged of a close encounter - this one off the San Diego coast from 2019. that frankly engage in actions that are difficult to explain, movements that are hard to replicate, that we donвЂ™t have the technology for, or traveling at speeds that exceed the sound barrier without a sonic boom.вЂќ He noted that former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said, вЂњWe are talking about objects. KleinвЂ™s thoughtful essay deserved a far better headline. On May 13, Ezra Klein, the Vox co-founder who is now a columnist for The New York Times, wrote a piece with a headline that perfectly reflected much of the mediaвЂ™s continuing refusal to take hard evidence seriously: вЂњEven if You Think Discussing Aliens Is Ridiculous, Just Hear Me Out.вЂќ On April 30, The New Yorker posted a riveting account by Gideon Lewis-Kraus of the 70-plus years of speculation about UFOs that ended up being a testimonial to how vastly stronger the evidence is for their existence now than in the 20th century, when bizarre stories about alien abductions captured the publicвЂ™s imagination. intelligence community have been required by the Senate intelligence committee to release a unclassified report by June detailing what it knows about UAPs - вЂњunidentified aerial phenomenons.вЂќ This coverage may have been triggered not by the evidence itself but by the fact that the Pentagon and the U.S. And waited.ДЄnd finally, over the past month, the fact that the Pentagon believes in UFOs - and that it had radar and infrared data to back this up, not just untrustworthy anecdotes from flight crews - has piqued the media interest it deserves. Both pieces noted that flight crews rarely made waves over their close encounters for fear of being seen as out there themselves.ДЄfter the Post report, I wrote a column saying the mild response to it and the TimesвЂ™ initial scoop was вЂњthe most baffling moment in the history of journalism.вЂќ Why? Because the source вЂњof this stunningly provocative evidence pointing to aliens frequenting Earth is not someone with a collection of tin-foil headware - itвЂ™s the Pentagon, the most technologically advanced, well-funded institution on the planet.вЂќ And I waited. The Post recounted similar evidence, then raised the national security implications of such aircraft. The Times focused on a fleet of rotating aircraft вЂњsurrounded by some kind of glowing aura traveling at high speedвЂќ off the coast of San Diego in 2004. In late 2017 and early 2018, first The New York Times and then The Washington Post published articles detailing internal government reports and videos documenting how military pilots had encountered unidentified flying objects that seemed to use technology far more advanced than anything achieved by humanity.